What Is Historical Anti-realism and How to Define It?

Journal of the Philosophy of History 18 (2):113-124 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Authors who advocate historical anti-realism have often insisted that they do not claim that no past events happened or that the past did not happen. In this paper, I show that in spite of such protestations, the core arguments presented by Leon Goldstein, Paul Roth, Frank Ankersmit, and Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen preclude the possibility that the past or past events happened.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,596

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Frank Ankersmit, Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen, and Paul Roth.Branko Mitrović - 2024 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 18 (2):173-186.
Counterfactual History: Three Worries and Replies.Helen Zhao - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 17 (1):9-30.
Realism about the Past.Murray Murphey - 2008 - In Aviezer Tucker (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 181–189.
Das Ungeschehene.Arun Iyer - 2018 - Research in Phenomenology 48 (1):77-91.
Narratives, Events & Monotremes: The Philosophy of History in Practice.Adrian Currie - 2023 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 17 (2):265-287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-01

Downloads
11 (#1,437,759)

6 months
11 (#276,189)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references