Michael Polanyi and Michael Oakeshott: Common Ground, Uncommon Foundations

Tradition and Discovery 28 (2):23-34 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the work of Michael Oakeshott in relation to that of Polanyi. While there are important similarities that Oakeshott himself recognized, their fundamentally different conceptions of reality—Polanyi ‘s realism and Oakeshott’s idealism—ultimately serve to highlight important distinctions between these two thinkers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tradition as a Topic of Philosophic Interest in Britain in the 1940s.Struan Jacobs - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:313-335.
Tradition as a Topic of Philosophic Interest in Britain in the 1940s.Struan Jacobs - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37:313-335.
Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott.Leslie Marsh - 2005 - In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott.Terry Nardin - 2001 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
The skeptic's Oakeshott.Steven Anthony Gerencser - 2000 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Rationalism and tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott conversation.Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1):3-24.
Michael Oakeshott as liberal theorist.Paul Franco - 1990 - Political Theory 18 (3):411-436.
Michael Oakeshott: An Introduction.Paul Franco - 2004 - Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
89 (#191,840)

6 months
2 (#1,203,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M. T. Mitchell
Deakin University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references