Criterialism versus Deliberativism

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):408-414 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I was one of the group that produced “An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM Policy Statement: Responding to Requests for Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Treatments in Intensive Care Units”. I do not write on that group’s behalf, but rather from two distinct perspectives which converge onto one view. First, I am a philosopher who thinks about our most pressing questions, such as how to make treatment decisions when a life is coming to an end. From that perspective, three of us from the group tried to set out the philosophical position that seemed to underpin the Multiorganization Policy Statement. That deliberativist position holds that...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A defence of anti-criterialism.Simon Langford - 2017 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (5):613-630.
Dualists needn’t be anti-criterialists.Duncan Matt - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (4):945-963.
A Challenge to Anti-Criterialism.Matt Duncan - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):283-296.
Ethical dilemmas in community mental health care.A. Liegeois - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):452-456.
What Types of Statements are There?James B. Freeman - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (2):135-157.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-25

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cheryl Misak
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references