More download options

What’s Kuhn got to do with it?

Philip Mirowski

History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):97-111 (2001) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Author's Profile

Philip Mirowski

Categories

History of Science, Misc in General Philosophy of Science

Sociology of Science in General Philosophy of Science

Thomas Kuhn in 20th Century Philosophy

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/095269510101400206

Other Versions

reprint

Mirowski, Philip (2003) "What's Kuhn got to do with it?". Social Epistemology 17(2-3):229-239

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 97,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

A Fuller Vision of Thomas Kuhn: Response to Roth and Mirowski.Steve Fuller - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (2):111-117.

Intellectuals and power, or, what's love got to do with it?Martin Jay - 2005 - Modern Intellectual History 2 (2):289-297.

Informed Consent and Respecting Autonomy: What's a Signature Got to Do with It?David Wendler & Jonathan E. Rackoff - 2001 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 23 (3):1.

What’s Labor Got to Do with It? Capitalism and the Counterproject.David Schweickart - 2001 - In Kory Schaff (ed.), _Philosophy and the Problems of Work: A Reader_. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

What's Luck Got to Do with It?Don S. Levi - 1989 - Philosophical Investigations 12 (1):1-13.

What’s Worship Got to Do with It? Interpreting Life Liturgically.[author unknown] - 2018

PHILIP MIROWSKI The Effortless Economy of Science? [REVIEW]Don Ross - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):659-665.

Philip Mirowski, Edward Nik‐Khah, The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.Verena Halsmayer - 2018 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 41 (4):484-485.

What’s Love Got to Do With It?Federica Giardini - 2010 - European Journal of Women's Studies 17 (1):73-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
14 (#1,153,182)

6 months
9 (#693,854)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Mirowski

Citations of this work

Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology.Kei Yoshida - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):365-378.

Michael Polanyi and the politics of science studies: Mary Jo Nye: Michael Polanyi and his generation: Origins of the social construction of science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2011, 428pp, $45.00 HB, $30.00 PB. [REVIEW]Charles Thorpe - 2013 - Metascience 23 (2):399-405.

Add more citations

References found in this work

World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science.Paul Horwich (ed.) - 1993 - MIT Press.

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Kuhn Thomas - 1962 - International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2 (2).

On playing the economics trump card in the philosophy of science: Why it did not work for Michael Polanyi.Philip Mirowski - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):138.

Why science studies has never been critical of science: Some recent lessons on how to be a helpful nuisance and a harmless radical.Steve Fuller - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):5-32.

Discussion.[author unknown] - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (1):87-124.

Add more references