The Systems of Relevance Logic

Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 1 (1):87-102 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The system R, or more precisely the pure implicational fragment R›, is considered by the relevance logicians as the most important. The another central system of relevance logic has been the logic E of entailment that was supposed to capture strict relevant implication. The next system of relevance logic is RM or R-mingle. The question is whether adding mingle axiom to R› yields the pure implicational fragment RM› of the system? As concerns the weak systems there are at least two approaches to the problem. First of all, it is possible to restrict a validity of some theorems. In another approach we can investigate even weaker logics which have no theorems and are characterized only by rules of deducibility.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deduction theorems for weak implicational logics.M. W. Bunder - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):95 - 108.
Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
Implicational f-structures and implicational relevance logics.A. Avron - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):788-802.
Modal logic as metalogic.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (3):173-201.
Relevant predication: Grammatical characterisations. [REVIEW]Philip Kremer - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):349 - 382.
Stoic Syllogistic.Susanne Bobzien - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
Defining relevant implication in a propositionally quantified S.Philip Kremer - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1057-1069.
Syllogisms with fractional quantifiers.Fred Johnson - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):401 - 422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-07-12

Downloads
298 (#65,412)

6 months
40 (#92,915)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation.Edwin David Mares - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Symbolic logic.Frederic Brenton Fitch - 1952 - New York,: Ronald Press Co..
Relevance Logic.Michael Dunn & Greg Restall - 1983 - In Dov M. Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Relevant Logics.Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer - 2017 - In Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 280–308.

View all 14 references / Add more references