The Fragile Nature of the Social Mind: a commentary on Alva Noë.

In Thomas Metzinger & Jennifer Windt (eds.), Open MIND. Cambridge: MIT. pp. 0-0 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I argue that while Noë’s actionist approach offers an excellent elaboration of classical approaches to conceptual understanding, it risks underestimating the role of social interactions and relations. Noë’s approach entails a form of body-based individualism according to which understanding is something the mind does all by itself. I propose that we adopt a stronger perspective on the role of sociality and consider the human mind in terms of socially enacted autonomy. On this view, the mind depends constitutively on engaging with and relating to others. As a consequence, conceptual understanding must be seen as a co-achievement. It is a fragile endeavour precisely because it depends not only on the individual but also on the continuous contribution of other subjects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Extended life.Ezequiel Di Paolo - 2008 - Topoi 28 (1):9-21.
The enactive approach and disorders of the self - the case of schizophrenia.Miriam Kyselo - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):591-616.
Where is the understanding?Adam Toon - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3859-3875.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-08

Downloads
30 (#519,519)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miriam Kyselo
Technische Universität Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations