American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):3-11 (2016)
Abstract |
Several factors related to fetal risk render it more or less acceptable in justifying constraints on the behavior of pregnant women. Risk is an unavoidable part of pregnancy and childbirth, one that women must balance against other vital personal and family interests. Two particular issues relate to the fairness of claims that pregnant women are never entitled to put their fetuses at risk: relative risks and relatives' risks. The former have been used—often spuriously—to advance arguments against activities, such as home birth, that may incur risk; the latter implicate the nature of relationships in determining the acceptability of coercing or precluding activities. Motivated reasoning by clinicians and judges leads to inaccurate risk assessments, and judgments based on false claims to objectivity. Such judgments undermine the moral and legal standing of pregnant women and do not advance the interests of fetuses, pregnant women, families, or states
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2015.1120791 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Review of Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.Dale E. Miller - unknown
Risk and the Pregnant Body.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Lisa M. Mitchell, Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong, Lisa H. Harris, Rebecca Kukla, Miriam Kuppermann & Margaret Olivia Little - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (6):34-42.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Relative Risk and Relatives' Risks in Genomic Medicine.Angela Fenwick, Shiri Shkedi-Rafid & Anneke Lucassen - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):25-27.
Parental Obligations Regarding Fetal Risk: Finding the Appropriate Analogy.Janet Malek - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):27-28.
Pregnancy and the Culture of Extreme Risk Aversion.Angela Ballantyne, Colin Gavaghan, John McMillan & Sue Pullon - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):21-23.
The Invisible Pregnant Woman.Kavita Shah Arora & Jonah Fleisher - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):23-25.
Ambiguous Interests: Maternal Desires and Fetal Interests.Peter Maloy Koch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):31-33.
View all 14 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Fetal Risks, Relative Risks, and Relatives' Risks”.Howard Minkoff & Mary Faith Marshall - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):13-13.
How Should Risks and Benefits Be Balanced in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses?C. Strong - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (6):1-5.
The Absolute Power of Relative Risk in Debates on Repeat Cesareans and Home Birth in the United States.E. Declercq - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (3):215-224.
Total and Partial Bivariate Risk Premia: An Extension.Béatrice Rey - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (1):59-69.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders.Whitney Davis & Harry J. van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Stakeholder Risk as Experienced by Non-Shareholder Stakeholders: An Ethical Analysis and Risk Magnitude Model.Whitney Davis & Harry J. Van Buren Iii - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:431-436.
Nutritional Risks of Vegan Diets to Women and Children: Are They Preventable? [REVIEW]Johanna Dwyer & Franklin M. Loew - 1994 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7 (1):87-109.
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.
Is There an Objective Way to Compare Research Risks?John Rossi & Robert M. Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427.
Maternal-Fetal Surgery: The Fallacy of Abstraction and the Problem of Equipoise. [REVIEW]Anne Drapkin Lyerly & Mary Briody Mahowald - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (2):151-165.
Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
Relative Risk and Relatives' Risks in Genomic Medicine.Angela Fenwick, Shiri Shkedi-Rafid & Anneke Lucassen - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):25-27.
Canadian Research Ethics Boards, MRI Research Risks, and MRI Risk Classification.Jennifer Marshall & Michael Hadskis - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (4):9-15.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-02-02
Total views
25 ( #455,699 of 2,506,517 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,517 )
2016-02-02
Total views
25 ( #455,699 of 2,506,517 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,517 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads