- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Evolutionary developmental biology does not offer a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm
In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 213–226 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction The Evolving Evolutionary Synthesis Population Genetics vs. Developmental Genetics Evo‐Devo's Central Target: The Study of Evolvability Origins? Conclusion Postscript: Counterpoint Acknowledgments References.
evolutionary developmental (evo‐devo) biologists evolving evolutionary synthesis evolution ‐ the modern synthesis population genetics vs. developmental genetics population genetics ‐ explaining microevolution developmental genetics evolutionary developmental biology developmental constraint or bias results of evo‐devo ‐ in conflict with tenets of neo‐Darwinism
Reprint years
2010
ISBN(s)
9781444314922 9781405159982
DOI
10.1002/9781444314922.ch12
My notes
Similar books and articles
Generative entrenchment and an evolutionary developmental biology for culture.William C. Wimsatt - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):364-366.
How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology?Jason Scott Robert - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):591-611.
Rhapsodic evolution: Essay on exaptation and evolutionary pluralism.Telmo Pievani - 2002 - World Futures 59 (2):63 – 81.
Neo-rationalism versus neo-darwinism: Integrating development and evolution. [REVIEW]Kelly C. Smith - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (4):431-451.
Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology.Ron Amundson - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):556-578.
Evolutionary developmental biology offers a significant challenge to the neo-Darwinian paradigm.Manfred D. Laubichler - 2009 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 199–212.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-05-19
Downloads
6 (#1,221,141)
6 months
6 (#160,349)
2010-05-19
Downloads
6 (#1,221,141)
6 months
6 (#160,349)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The emerging structure of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: where does Evo-Devo fit in?Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda & Francisco Vergara-Silva - 2018 - Theory in Biosciences 137.
Evolutionary novelty and the Evo-devo synthesis: field notes.I. Brigandt & Alan C. Love - 2010 - Evolutionary Biology 37:93–99.
Typology and Natural Kinds in Evo-Devo.Ingo Brigandt - 2021 - In Laura Nuño De La Rosa & Gerd Müller (eds.), Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Reference Guide. Cham: Springer. pp. 483-493.
Theory is as Theory Does: Scientific Practice and Theory Structure in Biology.Alan C. Love - 2013 - Biological Theory 7 (4):325-337, 430.
Extended Synthesis: Theory Expansion or Alternative?Gerd B. Müller & Massimo Pigliucci - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (3):275-276.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b7fd944d-gh87m N