- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Can ‘eugenics’ be defended?
Monash Bioethics Review 39 (1):60-67 (2021)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
Defending Eugenics: From cryptic choice to conscious selection.Jonny Anomaly - 2018 - Monash Bioethics Review 35:24-35.
Recensie: Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement/Nicholas Agar.(Oxford, 2004).Leen Trommelmans - 2006 - Ethical Perspectives 13 (2):321-323.
Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement: Nicholas Agar Malden Blackwell publishing; 2004 ISBN 1-4051-2309-7.Peter Hobbins, Lynley Anderson, Nikki Cunningham, Mike Carnahan, Julie Park, Justin Denholm, Christopher Newell & Jean McPherson - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (2):106-115.
Liberalism and eugenics.Robert Sparrow - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):499 - 517.
Review of Nicholas Agar, Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. [REVIEW]Michael Hauskeller - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (11).
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-04-15
Downloads
1,027 (#16,005)
6 months
345 (#5,874)
2021-04-15
Downloads
1,027 (#16,005)
6 months
345 (#5,874)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Race, Eugenics, and the Holocaust.Jonathan Anomaly - 2022 - In Ira Bedzow & Stacy Gallin (eds.), Bioethics and the Holocaust. Springer. pp. 153-170.
Creating Future People: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Enhancement (2nd edition).Jonathan Anomaly - 2024 - London, UK: Routledge.
The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement: Key Concepts and Future Prospects.Jonathan Anomaly & Tess Johnson - 2016 - In Steve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini & Sagar Sanyal (eds.), The Ethics of Human Enhancement: Understanding the Debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 143-151.
Modular Ontologies for Genetically Modified People and their Bioethical Implications.Derek So, Robert Sladek & Yann Joly - 2024 - NanoEthics 18 (2):1-35.
References found in this work
Procreative Beneficence and Genetic Enhancement.Walter Veit - 2018 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):75-92.
Cognitive Enhancement and the Threat of Inequality.Walter Veit - 2018 - Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2 (4):1-7.
Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People.John Harris - 2007 - Princeton University Press.
Recognizing the Diversity of Cognitive Enhancements.Walter Veit, Brian D. Earp, Nadira Faber, Nick Bostrom, Justin Caouette, Adriano Mannino, Lucius Caviola, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):250-253.
Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children.Julian Savulescu - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (5-6):413-426.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-76d885d765-cn7nt uwo