Conscience and Carnage in Afghanistan and Iraq: US Veterans Ponder the Experience

Journal of Military Ethics 13 (2):137-157 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the massive carnage of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, this article examines the institution of conscientious objection and the treatment of conscientious objectors. It concludes that while the number of objectors discharged from the US military in the two wars was small, the issues of conscience they articulated resonated widely through the ranks. This article seeks to make available their experience as a resource to inform the broader ongoing debate about the wars and their implications for military ethics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sincerity, accuracy and selective conscientious objection.Mark Navin - 2013 - Journal of Military Ethics 12 (2):111 - 128.
Unjust War and the Catholic Soldier.Ward Thomas - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (3):509 - 525.
The U.S. War in Iraq, Just War Theory and Neoconservatism.Rodney G. Peffer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:115-151.
Objecting morally.C. A. J. Coady - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (4):375-397.
What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Lessons for Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond.Brian Orend - 2013 - In Fritz Allhoff, Nicholas Evans & Adam Henschke (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Ethics and War: Just War Theory in the 21st Century. Routledge. pp. 132.
No Just War for the Empire.Ann Ferguson - 2006 - Radical Philosophy Today 4:27-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-03

Downloads
22 (#669,532)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?