A Framework for Validating Information Systems Research Based on a Pluralist Account of Truth and Correctness

Abstract

Research in information systems includes a range of approaches which make varied contributions in terms of knowledge, understanding, or practical developments. In these days of “fake news” and spurious internet content, scholarly research needs to be able to demonstrate its validity – are its finding true, or its recommendations correct? We argue that there are fundamental validation criteria that can be applied to all research approaches despite their apparent diversity and conflict. These stem from current views of the nature of truth, and the related but wider concept correctness, within philosophy. There has been much debate about the nature of truth – is it correspondence, coherence, consensual or pragmatic? Current debates revolve around the idea of a pluralist view of truth – that there are different forms of truth depending on the context or domain. Related to truth is the wider concept of correctness – propositions may be true but correctness can also be applied to actions, performances or behavior for which truth is not appropriate. We develop a framework for research validity and apply it to a range of research forms including positivist, interpretive, design science, critical and action-oriented. The benefits are: i) a greater and more explicit focus on validity criteria will produce better research; ii) having a single framework can provide some commonality between what at times seem conflicting approaches to research; iii) having criteria made explicit should encourage debate and further development. The framework is applied to a variety of empirical papers employing varied research approaches.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Asking Questions of Nature.Donald Mark Bauder - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Deflationary Truth and Truth-Biology.Margo Laasberg - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (2):265-283.
Engel on doxastic correctness.Conor McHugh - 2017 - Synthese 194 (5):1451-1462.
Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
Heidegger and truth as correspondence.Mark A. Wrathall - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):69 – 88.
Paulo Freire and political correctness.Peter Roberts - 1997 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 29 (2):83–101.
James's Theory of Truth as a Theory of Knowledge.Michael D. Bybee - 1984 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20 (3):253 - 267.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-24

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Edmund Gettier - 1963 - Analysis 23 (6):121-123.
How to make our ideas clear.C. S. Peirce - 1878 - Popular Science Monthly 12 (Jan.):286-302.
Facts and Propositions.Frank P. Ramsey - 1927 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 7 (1):153-170.
A realist conception of truth.William P. Alston - 1996 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references