A Framework for Representing Knowledge

Abstract

It seems to me that the ingredients of most theories both in Artificial Intelligence and in Psychology have been on the whole too minute, local, and unstructured to account–either practically or phenomenologically–for the effectiveness of common-sense thought. The "chunks" of reasoning, language, memory, and "perception" ought to be larger and more structured; their factual and procedural contents must be more intimately connected in order to explain the apparent power and speed of mental activities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Formalizing multiple interpretation of legal knowledge.Andreas Hamfelt - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):221-265.
Descartes' Mind‐Body Composites, Psychology and Naturalism.Lilli Alanen - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):464 – 484.
The emplotted self: Self-deception and self-knowledge.Rachel Brown - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (3):279-300.
Two Kinds of Self‐Knowledge.Matthew Boyle - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):133-164.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
287 (#68,136)

6 months
26 (#109,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references