- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The “Reasonable Subject Standard” as an Alternative to the “Best Interest Standard”
American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):66-67 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Homophobic Sexual Harassment Claim and Sexuality Discrimination.James Rocha - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (2):204-215.
Reasonable Care: Equality as Objectivity. [REVIEW]Avihay Dorfman - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (4):369-407.
Child Organ Donation, Family Autonomy, and Intimate Attachments.Lynn A. Jansen - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):133-142.
The "Reasonable Person" and the Psychopath.Jeffrey Bedrick - 2014 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (1):13-15.
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. [REVIEW]Erica K. Salter - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198.
In Defence of Reasonable Doubt.Georgi Gardiner - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):221-241.
Reasonable women in the law.Susan Dimock - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):153-175.
Predictive Genetic Testing of Children and the Role of the Best Interest Standard: Currents in Contemporary Bioethics.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):899-906.
Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard.Mayo Moran - 2003 - Oxford University Press USA.
Case comment: Quantification of the ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt’ standard.James Franklin - 2005 - Law, Probability and Risk 6:159-165.
Knowing How Without Knowing That.Yuri Cath - 2011 - In John Bengson & Mark Moffett (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press. pp. 113.
Medical malpractice and the legal standard of care.Gary E. Jones - 1989 - Journal of Medical Humanities 10 (1):45-54.
Upholding Standards: A Realist Ontology of Standard Form Jazz.Julian Dodd - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (3):277-290.
Does Informed Consent to Research Require Comprehension?Gopal Sreenivasan - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:85-93.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-08-24
Downloads
23 (#664,515)
6 months
6 (#504,917)
2018-08-24
Downloads
23 (#664,515)
6 months
6 (#504,917)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Secular Clinical Ethicists Should Not Be Neutral Toward All Religious Beliefs: An Argument for a Moral-Metaphysical Proceduralism.Abram L. Brummett - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (6):5-16.
Rumors of the Best Interest Standard’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated, and the Harm Principle Remains Tenuous: Responding to My Commentators.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):W1-W5.
References found in this work
The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children.Johan Christiaan Bester - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (8):9-19.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo