The rhetorical and administrative presidencies

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (2-3):379-401 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The modern presidency emerged not from an effort to escape constitutional propriety, as Tulis argues, but, rather, to emancipate presidents from the localized political parties of the nineteenth century, which had come to be viewed as sites of provincial and corrupt forms of popular rule. As the troubled tenure of George W. Bush suggests, contemporary presidents are torn between the public expectation that they stand apart from party politics and act as the chief executive of the administrative state; and their role as party leaders, which links them to political allies in Congress and loyalists in the electorate. In its contribution to the development of a “new” national programmatic party system, the Bush administration reveals the potential for a novel, disturbing meld of party and administration, in which presidents seek to exploit the powers of the modern executive office for partisan gain

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining Rhetorical Argumentation.Christian Kock - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):437-464.
Administrative Crisis.William G. Scott & David K. Hart - 2001 - In Willa M. Bruce (ed.), Classics of Administrative Ethics. Westview Press. pp. 410.
Administrative Responsibility in.Herman Finer - 2001 - In Willa M. Bruce (ed.), Classics of Administrative Ethics. Westview Press. pp. 5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations