The Impact of Relative Position and Relational Closeness on the Reporting of Unethical Acts

Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):315-328 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Empowerment and teamwork are buzzwords of progressive human resource practices. Along with these new job design methods come reduced hierarchical control mechanisms. In light of recent ethical scandals, there is considerable concern regarding the effectiveness of the control systems of these more recent work designs. This study compared the willingness of participants to report unethical behavior when presented with work scenarios in which the perpetrator was in the relative position of team member, peer, or subordinate and in cohesive or non-cohesive conditions of relational closeness. After accounting for the covariates, both main effects and interaction effects were found, indicating that reporting behavior was influenced by relative position and relational closeness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is environmental reporting changing corporate behaviour?Mark Price - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):189.
Unethical Demand and Employee Turnover.Lamar Pierce & Jason A. Snyder - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 131 (4):853-869.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
32 (#471,613)

6 months
11 (#191,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Exploring social desirability bias.Janne Chung & Gary S. Monroe - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (4):291 - 302.
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams.James R. Barker - 2005 - In Christopher Grey & Hugh Willmott (eds.), Critical Management Studies: A Reader. Oxford University Press UK.

View all 16 references / Add more references