The Ethics of Digital Being: Vulnerability, Invulnerability, and ‘Dangerous Surprises’

In Amanda Lagerqvist (ed.), Digital Existence: Ontology, Ethics and transcendence in Digital Culture. Routledge Studies in Religion and Digital Culture. Routledge. pp. 171-186 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter will engage with the notion that one of the key defining features of digital being, at least in terms of ethical engagement with others via technological interfaces and networks, is a heightened state of both invulnerability and vulnerability. Merleau-Ponty suggested that embodied existence in the world is defined by a stance of vulnerability and the anticipation of ‘dangerous surprises’. In digital existence, I suggest that our continuous, archived, digital presence, distributed in a multitude of networks, archives, databases and servers, opens us up to increased vulnerabilities of which we are only partially aware. These vulnerabilities become more present to us when we hear of, or are the victims of trolling, a data breach, hacking scandal or other form of ‘dangerous surprise’. This chapter looks in detail at two incidents: the five-year long trolling campaign against Nicola Brookes, and the ‘Ashley Madison hack’ of 2015. Using these examples, this paper will investigate the notion of vulnerability as one way to investigate being in the digital age. I argue that digital being consists of a contradictory stance to the world: of heightened invulnerability in our social encounters with others, alongside a heightened vulnerability to a host of unknown ‘dangerous surprises’. I suggest further that the negotiation of this stance is fundamental to any development of an ethics for the digital age.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Digital Ethics: Cases and Contexts.Jonathan Beever, Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick - 2019 - New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Rudy McDaniel & Nancy A. Stanlick.
How Do We Need Universities in a Technological World?Viorel Guliciuc - 2009 - Dialogue and Universalism 19 (1-2):95-100.
Circles: Networks of Reading.Massimo Lollini - 2015 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 4 (1):1-34.
Cultura y contracultura digital: un ensayo.Jorge Portilla - 2011 - Apuntes Filosóficos 20 (39).
Prolegomena to Digital Communication Ethics.Robert Arnãutu - 2006 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):23-31.
The contradictions of digital modernity.Kieron O’Hara - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):197-208.
Representation in digital systems.Vincent C. Müller - 2008 - In P. Brey, A. Briggle & K. Waelbers (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. IOS Press. pp. 116-121.
Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research.Carl H. Coleman - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):12-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-07

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references