The conflicted character of picture perception

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):471–477 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is often assumed that there is a perceptual conflict in looking at a picture since one sees both a two-dimensional surface and a three-dimensional scene simultaneously. In this paper, I argue that it is a mistake to think that looking at pictures requires the visual system to perform the special task of reconciling inconsistent impressions of space, or competing information from different depth cues. To the contrary, I suggest that there are good reasons to think that the perception of depth in pictures is achieved in much the same way as is the perception of depth in any ordinary case.

Similar books and articles

Hell. [REVIEW]Thomas Talbott - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):143-148.
Pictures and singular thought.John Zeimbekis - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):11-21.
Double, double, toil and trouble – fire burn, and theory bubble!Birgitta Dresp - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):409-410.
The Irony in Pictures.G. Currie - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):149-167.
Representing the impossible.Jennifer Matey - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (2):188 - 206.
Scene Perception.Ronald A. Rensink - 2000 - In A. E. Kazdin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford University Press. pp. 151-155.
Perceiving pictures.Bence Nanay - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):461-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
540 (#32,307)

6 months
87 (#48,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Boyd Millar
Trent University

Citations of this work

Depiction, Pictorial Experience, and Vision Science.Robert Briscoe - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (2):43-81.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references