Schwartzman vs. Okin: Some Comments on Challenging Liberalism

Hypatia 24 (4):164-177 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01064.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Schwartzman vs. Okin: Some Comments on Challenging Liberalism.Charles W. Mills - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):164 - 177.
Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism.Elizabeth Anderson - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):130 - 145.
Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism.Elizabeth Anderson - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):130-145.
Globalizing Feminist Methodology: Building on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism.Theresa W. Tobin - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):145-164.
Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique by Lisa H. Schwartzman.Samantha Brennan - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (1):220-223.
An analysis of Susan Moller Okin’s problematic approach to multiculturalism. A feminist comprehensive liberalism gone wrong.Evelien Geerts - manuscript
Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas.Amy R. Baehr - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):49 - 66.
A philosophical analysis of the problematical feminist-liberal approaches to the phenomenon of multiculturalism. Down with feminist liberalism?Evelien Geerts - manuscript
Humanist liberalism.Susan Moller Okin - 1989 - In Nancy L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life.
Non-Ideal Theorizing, Social Groups, and Knowledge of Oppression: A Response.Lisa H. Schwartzman - 2009 - Hypatia 24 (4):177 - 188.
OKIN's FEMINIST CHALLENGE TO RAWLS's THEORY OF JUSTICE. FROM THEORY TO PUBLIC ACTION.Alexandra Dobra - 2011 - Studia UBB Philosophia (1):52-64.
pp. 462-63. Susan Moller Okin suggests that one reasonable interpretation of Rawls's PL is that it requires that the family be internally subject to the two principles of justice. So, under this interpretation, patriarchal family forms might be disallowed by Rawls's theory. See Okin," Political Liberalism, Justice and Gender,".T. O. J. Rawls - 1994 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 105--23.
Can Liberalism Account for Women’s “Adaptive Preferences”?Lisa H. Schwartzman - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:175-186.
The real environmental crisis: Why poverty, not affluence, is the environment's number one enemy.Peter Schwartzman & David Schwartzman - 2006 - Science and Society 70 (3):437-440.
Political liberalism, justice, and gender.Moller Okin Susan - 1994 - In Peter Singer (ed.), Ethics. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
42 (#361,008)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Mills
Last affiliation: CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Idealizing Morality.Lisa Tessman - 2010 - Hypatia 25 (4):797 - 824.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Justice as fairness: a restatement.John Rawls (ed.) - 2001 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Polity Press.
Justice, Gender and the Family.Susan Moller Okin - 1989 - Hypatia 8 (1):209-214.
The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.

View all 15 references / Add more references