Scepticism, perceptual knowledge, and doxastic responsibility

Synthese 189 (2):353-372 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Arguments for scepticism about perceptual knowledge are often said to have intuitively plausible premises. In this discussion I question this view in relation to an argument from ignorance and argue that the supposed persuasiveness of the argument depends on debatable background assumptions about knowledge or justification. A reasonable response to scepticism has to show there is a plausible epistemological perspective that can make sense of our having perceptual knowledge. I present such a perspective. In order give a more satisfying response to scepticism, we need also to consider the standing of background beliefs. This is required since the recognitional abilities that enable us to have perceptual knowledge are informed by, or presuppose, a picture or conception of the world the correctness of which we have not ascertained. The question is how, in the face of this, to make sense of responsible belief-formation. In addressing this problem I make a suggestion about the standing of certain crucial beliefs linking appearances with membership of kinds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Perceptual-recognitional abilities and perceptual knowledge.Alan Millar - 2008 - In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge. Oxford University Press. pp. 330--47.
Doxastic Voluntarism: A Sceptical Defence.Danny Frederick - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (1):24-44.
Perceptual evidence and the new dogmatism.Ram Neta - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):199-214.
Scepticism and the senses.Barry Stroud - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):559-570.
The nature and value of knowledge: three investigations.Duncan Pritchard - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock.
Perceptual knowledge.John L. Pollock - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (3):287-319.
Knowledge and evidence.Paul K. Moser - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The epicurean argument: Determinism and scepticism.Christopher Hookway - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):79 – 94.
Effective Sceptical Hypotheses.Steven L. Reynolds - 2012 - Theoria 79 (3):262-278.
Perceptual knowledge and the metaphysics of experience.Michael Pace - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):642-664.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-07

Downloads
165 (#119,479)

6 months
17 (#161,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Millar
University of Stirling

Citations of this work

A Better Disjunctivist Response to the 'New Evil Genius' Challenge.Kegan J. Shaw - 2017 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 94 (1-2):101-125.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Epistemology and cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
On Certainty (ed. Anscombe and von Wright).Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1969 - San Francisco: Harper Torchbooks. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe, G. H. von Wright & Mel Bochner.
A virtue epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 45 references / Add more references