Some hard questions for critical rationalism

Abstract

‘What distinguishes science from all other human endeavours is that the accounts of the world that our best, mature sciences deliver are strongly supported by evidence and this evidence gives us the strongest reason to believe them.’ That anyway is what is said at the beginning of the advertisement for a conference on induction at a celebrated British seat of learning in 2007. It shows how much critical rationalists still have to do to make known the message of Logik der Forschung concerning what empirical evidence is able to do and what it does.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On Critical and Pancritical Rationalism.Antoni Diller - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):127-156.
The roots of critical rationalism.John Wettersten (ed.) - 1992 - Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Antipositivist theories of the sciences: critical rationalism, critical theory, and scientific realism.Norman Stockman - 1983 - Hingham, MA: Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer.
Critical Rationalism in the Test Tube?Nikos Psarros - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):297 - 305.
On the Reliability of Science: The Critical Rationalist Version.Joseph Agassi - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (1):100-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-06

Downloads
52 (#293,581)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?