Science1 and Religion: Their Logical Similarity: JOHN. F. MILLER

Religious Studies 5 (1):49-68 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his “Theology and Falsification” Professor Antony Flew challenges the sophisticated religious believer to state under what conceivable occurrences he would concede that there really is no God Who loves mankind: ‘Just what would have to happen not merely to tempt but also, logically and rightly, to entitle us to say “God does not love us” or even “God does not exist”? I therefore put…the simple central questions, “What would have to occur or to have occurred to constitute for you a disproof of the love of, or of the existence of, God”?’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Falsification Response.Antony Flew - 1969 - Religious Studies 5 (1):77 - 79.
The Objectives of Science1.David Miller - 2007 - Philosophia Scientiae 11:21-43.
Faith: And Faith in Hypotheses.John King-Farlow & William N. Christensen - 1971 - Religious Studies 7 (2):113 - 124.
The Falsification Challenge.J. Kellenberger - 1969 - Religious Studies 5 (1):69 - 76.
On Religion.John D. Caputo - 2001 - New York: Routledge.
Why “God Loves Mankind” is Unfalsitiable.John F. Miller Iii - 1973 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):81-88.
The Criterion of Love and the Accusing Heart in 1 John.Andrew Tallon - 2005 - Philosophy and Theology 17 (1-2):177-228.
Science and Religion: Reply to John F. Miller.Norman C. Siefferman - 1970 - Religious Studies 6 (3):281 - 287.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
49 (#287,646)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references