Reply to Zwirn & Zwirn


I am indebted to Zwirn and Zwirn [1989] for their extended and careful comments on the arguments of Popper & Miller [1983], [1987], and also for friendly and illuminating conversations. Their judgement seems to be that although Popper and I fail to make a satisfactory case for our conclusion that inductive probability is impossible, that conclusion is nonetheless defensible on quite other grounds. I don’t really agree with this, as I shall explain



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

11 (#1,004,714)

6 months
2 (#785,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Miller
Nuffield College, Oxford University

Citations of this work

Metaconfirmation.Denis Zwirn & Herv� P. Zwirn - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):195-228.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references