Enhancement Technologies and Professional Integrity

&
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):15-17 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

*The opinions expressed are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the National Institutes of Health, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265160591002719

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Enhancement technologies and professional integrity.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):15 – 17.
The Rhetoric of Enhancing the Human: Examining the Tropes of "the Human" and "Dignity" in Contemporary Bioethical Debates over Enhancement Technologies.Kurt Zemlicka - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (3):257-279.
Enhancement Technologies and the Modern Self.C. Elliott - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4):364-374.
State neutrality and the ethics of human enhancement technologies.John Basl - 2010 - AJOB 1 (2):41-48.
Medical Futility and Physician Discretion.Michael Wreen - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1 (3):257-267.
Life Enhancement Technologies: Significance of Social Category Membership.Christine Overall - 2009 - In Julian Savulescu & Nick Bostrom (eds.), Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
Enhancing justice?Tamara Garcia & Ronald Sandler - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (3):277-287.
Citation, please cite the printed work: Miah, A. (2006) rethinking enhancement in sport, in Bainbridge, W.s. & Roco, M.c. 'Progress in convergence: Technologies for human wellbeing.' Annals of the. [REVIEW]Andy Miah - unknown
— ŽŽ—œŽ ˜ ˜œ‘ž–Š— ’—’In Defence of Posthuman Dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202-214.
Integrity in the public and private domains.Alan Montefiore & David Vines (eds.) - 1999 - New York: Routledge.
In defense of posthuman dignity.Nick Bostrom - 2005 - Bioethics 19 (3):202–214.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
Is Human Enhancement also a Personal Matter?Vincent Menuz, Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):161-177.
Visions and Ethics in Current Discourse on Human Enhancement.Arianna Ferrari, Christopher Coenen & Armin Grunwald - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (3):215-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
5 (#1,510,250)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Response to Commentators on “What's Wrong With Enhancement?”.Frances Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):W4-W9.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references