On Millgram on mill

Utilitas 16 (1):96-108 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent article in Ethics, Elijah Millgram presents a novel reconstruction of J. S. Mill's ‘proof’ of the principle of utility. Millgram's larger purpose is to critique instrumentalist approaches to practical reasoning. His reading of the proof makes Mill out to be an instrumentalist, and Millgram thinks that the ultimate failure of Mill's argument usefully illustrates an inconsistency inherent in instrumentalism. Yet Millgram's interpretation of the proof does not succeed. Mill is not an instrumentalist. Millgram may be right that instrumentalism is incoherent, but he has chosen the wrong figure to illustrate the point.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,140

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill's incubus.Elijah Millgram - 2010 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
John Stuart Mill, determinism, and the problem of induction.Elijah Millgram - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):183-199.
Practical Induction.Elijah Millgram - 1997 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Was Hume a Humean?Elijah Millgram - 1995 - Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#164,885)

6 months
1 (#447,993)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dale E. Miller
Old Dominion University

Citations of this work

Mill’s proof and the guise of the good.Francesco Orsi - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (1):93-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references