Utilitas 16 (1):96-108 (2004)
AbstractIn a recent article in Ethics, Elijah Millgram presents a novel reconstruction of J. S. Mill's ‘proof’ of the principle of utility. Millgram's larger purpose is to critique instrumentalist approaches to practical reasoning. His reading of the proof makes Mill out to be an instrumentalist, and Millgram thinks that the ultimate failure of Mill's argument usefully illustrates an inconsistency inherent in instrumentalism. Yet Millgram's interpretation of the proof does not succeed. Mill is not an instrumentalist. Millgram may be right that instrumentalism is incoherent, but he has chosen the wrong figure to illustrate the point.
Similar books and articles
Mill's incubus.Elijah Millgram - 2010 - In Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & D. Weinstein (eds.), John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life. Oxford University Press.
John Stuart Mill, determinism, and the problem of induction.Elijah Millgram - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2):183-199.
Liberty, the higher pleasures, and mill's missing science of ethnic jokes.Elijah Millgram - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):326-353.
John Stuart Mill and the Art of Life.Ben Eggleston, Dale E. Miller & David Weinstein (eds.) - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.