On lorentz's methodology

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):29-45 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Group selection and methodological individualism: A criticism of Watkins.Edward Reed - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):256-262.
Revolutions in a revolution.József Illy - 1981 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (3):175-210.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's?S. J. Prokhovnik - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):336-340.

Add more references