Notes and comments on Leibniz's Contigency

(2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contigency is a definition for which is noted for not having the principle of contradiction in itself, for which gives a different truths from what we are used to derive from geometry as an essential field for knowledge of creating strong logics. Leibniz clearly states one of his ideas for God, and why there must be contigent truths and necessary truths.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes’ eternal truths, created and un created.Predrag Milidrag - 2005 - Filozofija I Društvo 2005 (26):157-175.
Leibniz on the Metaphysical Foundation of Physics.Daniel R. Temple - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Van Inwagen on the Cosmological Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (1):31-40.
The Paradox of Sufficient Reason.Samuel Levey - 2016 - Philosophical Review Recent Issues 125 (3):397-430.
Merely possible explanation.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
The analytic-synthetic distinction.Stanley Munsat - 1971 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
On ‘a new cosmological argument’.Graham Oppy - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
Against Moral Truths.Seungbae Park - 2012 - Cultura 9 (1):179-194.
Tennant's troubles.Timothy Williamson - 2009 - In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-23

Downloads
210 (#92,045)

6 months
59 (#71,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references