It is likely misbelief never has a function

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):529-530 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I highlight and amplify three central points that McKay & Dennett (M&D) make about the origin of failures to perform biologically proper functions. I question whether even positive illusions meet criteria for evolved misbelief

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A proper understanding of Millikan.Justine Kingsbury - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (40):23-40.
In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
The evolution of misbelief.Ryan McKay & Daniel Dennett - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):493–510; discussion 510–61.
Misbelief and the neglect of environmental context.David Dunning - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):517-518.
Pathological and non-pathological factors in delusional misbelief.Robyn Langdon - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (6):527-528.
Troubles with Wagner's reading of Millikan.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1997 - Philosophical Studies 86 (1):93-96.
Fitness and function.D. M. Walsh - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):553-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
74 (#218,358)

6 months
17 (#142,297)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ruth Millikan
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Précis of Delusions and Beliefs: A Philosophical Inquiry.Kengo Miyazono - 2022 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):1-5.
Art and Belief.Kengo Miyazono - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (3):342-344.

Add more citations