Philosophical Explorations 20 (3):294-307 (2017)
Abstract |
Abolitionism is the view that if no one is responsible, then we ought to abandon the reactive attitudes. Proponents suggest that reactive attitudes can be replaced in our emotional repertoire by non-reactive analogues. In this paper, I dispute and reject a common challenge to abolitionism according to which the reactive attitudes are necessary for protesting unfairness and maintaining social harmony. While other abolitionists dispute the empirical basis of this objection, I focus on its implications. I argue that even if non-reactive analogues cannot perform the interpersonal and social functions of reactive attitudes, it does not follow that the losses of abandoning them outweigh the gains of retaining them. The force of the challenge rests on a mistake, identified by John Stuart Mill among others, that is common when evaluating entrenched social practices.
|
Keywords | moral responsibility reactive attitudes abolitionism Strawson Nichols |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1080/13869795.2017.1298830 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 52 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Skepticism About Moral Responsibility.Gregg D. Caruso - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018):1-81.
Buddhism, Free Will, and Punishment: Taking Buddhist Ethics Seriously.Gregg D. Caruso - 2020 - Zygon 55 (2):474-496.
Inadequate Agency and Appropriate Anger.Daphne Brandenburg - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (1):169-185.
Similar books and articles
Reactive Attitudes and Personal Relationships.Per-Erik Milam - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):102-122.
Explaining and Expanding the Scope of Strawson's Reactive Attitudes: An Examination and Application of Freedom and Resentment.Daniel E. Rossi-Keen - 2007 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):46-63.
Reactive Attitudes and Second-Personal Address.Michelle Mason - forthcoming - In Remy Debes & Karsten Stueber (eds.), Ethical Sentimentalism. Cambridge University Press.
Public Justification and the Reactive Attitudes.Anthony Taylor - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (1):97-113.
Horror Films and the Argument From Reactive Attitudes.Scott Woodcock - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):309-324.
Beyond Belief: Toward a Theory of the Reactive Attitudes.Elisa A. Hurley & Coleen Macnamara - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (3):373-399.
Responsibility and Dignity: Strawsonian Themes.Bennett W. Helm - 2011 - In Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Morality and the Emotions. Oxford University Press. pp. 217-34.
Dissolving Reactive Attitudes: Forgiving and Understanding.Lucy Allais - 2008 - South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):197-201.
Love as a Reactive Emotion.Adam Leite Kate Abramson - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):673-699.
Reactive Attitudes as Communicative Entities.Coleen Macnamara - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):546-569.
Love as a Reactive Emotion.Kate Abramson & Adam Leite - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):673-699.
Reactive Attitudes, Forgiveness, and the Second-Person Standpoint.Alexandra Couto - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1309-1323.
Reactive Attitudes and the Hare–Williams Debate: Towards a New Consequentialist Moral Psychology.D. E. Miller - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (254):39-59.
Rationality and the Reactive Attitudes.Angus Ross - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):45-58.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-03-15
Total views
51 ( #220,331 of 2,498,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,176 of 2,498,798 )
2017-03-15
Total views
51 ( #220,331 of 2,498,798 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,176 of 2,498,798 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads