Do we reason when we think we reason, or do we think?


If the open society is a society that ‘sets free the critical powers of man’ (Popper, 1945, Introduction), then the subject of critical thinking, now widely taught in universities in North America and at the level of further education in the UK, might seem to be a welcome innovation. Caution is advised. By mistakenly supposing that thinking intelligently is identical with thinking logically, critical thinking textbooks almost invariably regard the purpose of argument to be a combination of justification and persuasion, authoritarian goals that critical rationalists, and other supporters of the open society, must shun. If students do not learn the proper place of reason, and its limitations, they will be disappointed when it fails, and like many irrationalists in the past, may be induced to reason their way out of reason altogether.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.


Added to PP

40 (#293,701)

6 months
1 (#448,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Non-deductive Logic in Mathematics: The Probability of Conjectures.James Franklin - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Springer. pp. 11--29.
The Contrast Between Dogmatic and Critical Arguments.Danny Frederick - 2015 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 22 (1):9-20.
Realizmus a princíp empirizmu1.Miloš Taliga - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19:273-290.
Formal logic and natural ways of reasoning.Roman Tuziak - 2021 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 16 (2):75-86.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references