Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):151 – 165 (2007)

Authors
Franklin Miller
Columbia University
Abstract
The doctrine of clinical equipoise is appealing because it appears to permit physicians to maintain their therapeutic obligation to offer optimal medical care to patients while conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The appearance, however, is deceptive. In this article we argue that clinical equipoise is defective and incoherent in multiple ways. First, it conflates the sound methodological principle that RCTs should begin with an honest null hypothesis with the questionable ethical norm that participants in these trials should never be randomized to an intervention known to be inferior to standard treatment. Second, the claim that RCTs preserve the therapeutic obligation of physicians misrepresents the patient-centered orientation of medical care. Third, the appeal to clinical equipoise as a basic principle of risk-benefit assessment for RCTs is incoherent. Finally, the difficulties with clinical equipoise cannot be resolved by viewing it as a presumptive principle subject to exceptions. In the final sections of the article, we elaborate on the non-exploitation framework for the ethics clinical research and indicate issues that warrant further inquiry.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03605310701255750
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Framework for Risk-Benefit Evaluations in Biomedical Research.Wendler Annette Rid David - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):141-179.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Real Problem with Equipoise.Winston Chiong - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):37 – 47.
Will the Real Charles Fried Please Stand Up?Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):353-357.
The Irrelevance of Equipoise.Robert M. Veatch - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):167 – 183.
Pulling the Plug on Clinical Equipoise: A Critique of Miller and Weijer.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (3):203-226.
Rehabilitating Equipoise.Paul B. Miller & Charles Weijer - 2003 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (2):93-118.
So-Called "Clinical Equipoise" and the Argument From Design.Fred Gifford - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (2):135 – 150.
What Makes Placebo-Controlled Trials Unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
89 ( #130,787 of 2,504,869 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,869 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes