- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Actual–Consequence Act Utilitarianism and the Best Possible Humans
Ratio 16 (1):49–62 (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/1467-9329.00205
My notes
Similar books and articles
Utilitarianism and infinite utility.Peter Vallentyne - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):212 – 217.
A dilemma for objective act-utilitarianism.Gerald Lang - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
Actual consequence utilitarianism: A reply to professor Singer.Jack Temkin - 1978 - Mind 87 (347):412-414.
Is actual consequence utilitarianism incoherent?Loren E. Lomasky - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):71-78.
Incoherence, inconsistency, and moral theory: More on actual consequence utilitarianism.Marcus G. Singer - 1982 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):375-391.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
81 (#156,516)
6 months
9 (#108,655)
2009-01-28
Downloads
81 (#156,516)
6 months
9 (#108,655)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Ross and the particularism/generalism divide.Kristian Olsen - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (1):56-75.
Objective consequentialism, right actions, and good people.Eric Moore - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):83 - 94.
Is Objective Consequentialism Compatible with the Principle that “Ought” Implies “Can”?Vuko Andrić - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (1):63-77.
References found in this work
Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism: For and Against.Gerald Dworkin, J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1975 - Philosophical Review 84 (3):419.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7cdd687c8d-w9tx6 N