Who is Right, Who is Wrong? Interpreting 14 Points of Wilson – A Case Study of Deontic Modals and their Meanings

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 66 (1):83-103 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The document titled “14 points of Wilson” was announced by the President of the United States Woodrow Wilson in his speech addressed to the United States Congress on 8th January 1918. The speech is one of the most well known documents of the First World War as it touched upon several world issues. The text has been interpreted ever since in respect to the importance and real meaning of points formulated by Wilson. One of the points referred to Poland. The aim of the paper is to focus on the exponents of deontic modality used in that text of historical value and to find the answer to the question concerning the deontic value of each point. The analysis will encompass the principles of deontic logic as well as the meaning of deontic modals in legal discourse at the time of speech delivery as those 14 points should be classified as a text belonging to legal genres. The aim of the paper is to present the historical background and the linguistic analysis in order to find out whether historical facts, interpretations and language used correspond with one another.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deontic Modals and Probability: One Theory to Rule Them All?Fabrizio Cariani - forthcoming - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press.
The Interpretation Of Vp Complements Of Deontic Modals.Sonja Miletic - 2006 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 4 (1):53-59.
Contrastive Semantics for Deontic Modals.Justin Snedegar - 2013 - In Martijn Blaauw (ed.), Contrastivism in philosophy. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Deontic Modals.Matthew Chrisman - 2015 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Decision Theory: Yes! Truth Conditions: No!Nate Charlow - 2016 - In Nate Charlow Matthew Chrisman (ed.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press.
Deontic Modals.Jennifer Carr - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 194-210.
Epistemic and Deontic Should.Fabrizio Cariani - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):73-84.
Deontic modals and hyperintensionality.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 27 (4):387-410.
Evidence Sensitivity in Weak Necessity Deontic Modals.Alex Silk - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):691-723.
An object‐based truthmaker semantics for modals.Friederike Moltmann - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):255-288.
Two puzzles about ability can.Malte Willer - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (3):551-586.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-20

Downloads
8 (#1,283,306)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aleksandra Matulewska
Adam Mickiewicz University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deontic logic.G. H. von Wright - 1951 - Mind 60 (237):1-15.
I. deontic logic.G. H. von Wright - 1951 - Mind 60 (237):1-15.
Deontic Logic.G. H. von Wright - 1952 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):140-140.

Add more references