Philosophia 47 (4):959-976 (2019)

Michael Michael
Yonsei University
Despite its profound influence on modern thought, psychoanalysis remains peripheral to the concerns of most analytic philosophers. I suggest that one of the main reasons for this is intellectual reservation, and explore some philosophical arguments against psychoanalysis that may be contributing to such reservation. Specifically, I address the objections that psychoanalytic theories are unfalsifiable, that the purported findings of psychoanalysis are readily explained as due to suggestion, that there is a troubling lack of consensus in psychoanalytic interpretation, and that there is a lack of support for psychoanalysis within mainstream science. I also consider a major obstacle to the acceptance of contemporary defenses of psychoanalysis: the “bad lot” argument against Inference to the Best Explanation. My conclusion is that, though these objections have some merit, they are not sufficient reasons for not taking psychoanalytic ideas seriously.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-018-0020-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1989 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.
The Inference to the Best Explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rereading Freud: Psychoanalysis Through Philosophy.Jon Mills (ed.) - 2004 - State University of New York Press.
Validation in the Clinical Theory of Psychoanalysis. [REVIEW]Kurt Fischer - 1993 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:275-277.
Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis.Margaret Nash - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
The Experience of Psychoanalysis.Bogdan Wolf - 2007 - Filozofski Vestnik 28 (2):229 - +.
Philosophical Antecedents of Freudian Psychoanalysis.Elvin Sanford Gabriel - 1987 - Dissertation, The George Washington University
Philosophical Essays on Freud.Richard Wollheim & James Hopkins (eds.) - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Rereading Freud: Psychoanalysis Through Philosophy.Jon Mills (ed.) - 2012 - State University of New York Press.
Die Geschlechtstheorie Freuds: Ihre Neuartigkeit Und Anwendung Auf den Feminismus.Yusuke Kaneko - 2017 - HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LETTERS 33 (2):150-167.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #254,235 of 2,463,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,109 of 2,463,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes