The actus reus requirement: A qualified defense

Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (1):11-17 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defense of hiring apparently less qualified women.Laura M. Purdy - 1984 - Journal of Social Philosophy 15 (2):26-33.
Gorr on actus reus.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1991 - Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (1):18-19.
The right to a competent electorate.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):700-724.
Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):31-54.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Probabilities: Reasonable or true?J. Alberto Coffa - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (2):186-198.
Voluntariness and the Orthodox Actus Reus Requirement.Stephen Mathis - 1998 - Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1):55-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
35 (#431,398)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Gorr
Wells College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Human Action.Alvin Ira Goldman - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Philosophy of criminal law.Douglas N. Husak - 1987 - Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
‘Unless’, ‘Until’, and the Time of a Killing.Lawrence Brian Lombard - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (2):135-154.

Add more references