Reasonably Traditional: Self-Contradiction and Self-Reference in Alasdair MacIntyre's Account of Tradition-Based Rationality
Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (3):315 - 339 (2002)
AbstractAlasdair MacIntyre's account of tradition-based rationality has been the subject of much discussion, as well as the object of some recent charges of inconsistency. The author considers arguments by Jennifer Herdt, Peter Mehl, and John Haldane which attempt to show that MacIntyre's account of rationality is, in some way, inconsistent. It is argued that the various charges of inconsistency brought against MacIntyre by these critics can be understood as variations on two general types of criticism: (1) that MacIntyre's account of tradition-based rationality presents a picture of rationality with inconsistent internal elements, and (2) that MacIntyre, in the act of presenting his picture of rationality, makes the sort of claims to which his own account of rationality denies legitimacy, and thus MacIntyre's account is self-referentially incoherent. In response to criticisms of the first sort, it is argued that MacIntyre can further clarify or develop his position to take the current criticisms into account without altering the fundamental aspects of his picture of rationality. In response to the charge of self-referential incoherence, it is argued that the charge rests on a mistaken understanding of MacIntyre's position and of the nature of justification. In dealing with these arguments, the author hopes to not only vindicate MacIntyre's account of rationality against the charges of some of its recent critics, but also to shed some light on the nature of arguments both for and against relativism and historicism
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
In Defense of the Rationality of Traditions.Peter Seipel - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):257-277.
Is Aristotelian Naturalism Safe From the Moral Outsider?Gennady McCracken - 2021 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24 (5):1123-1137.
Similar books and articles
Refurbishing MacIntyre's Account of Practice.Paul Hager - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):545-561.
MacIntyre and the Limits of Kierkegaardian Rationality.Bruce W. Ballard - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):126-132.
Metaphysics, History, and Rational Justification: A Maclntyrean Response to Franklin Gamwell's Critique.Kent Reames - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):257 - 281.
The Invisible Hand of Rationality: On the Intersection of Adam Smith and Alasdair MacIntyre.Jack Russell Weinstein - unknown
Macintyre on Tradition, Rationality, and Relativism.M. Kuna - 2005 - Res Publica 11 (3):251-273.
Macintyre's Thomist Revival : What Next?John Haldane - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press.
Alasdair Macintyre : After Virtue and After.John Horton & Susan Mendus - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press.
Macintyre and Historicism.Robert Stern - 1994 - In John Horton & Susan Mendus (eds.), After Macintyre: Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair Macintyre. University of Notre Dame Press.
Tradition, Rationality, and Virtue: The Thought of Alasdair Macintyre. By Thomas D. D'Andrea.John R. Williams - 2008 - Heythrop Journal 49 (3):513–515.