Overcoming the modal/amodal dichotomy of concepts

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (4):655-677 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate about the nature of the representational format of concepts seems to have reached an impasse. The debate faces two fundamental problems. Firstly, amodalists (i.e., those who argue that concepts are represented by amodal symbols) and modalists (i.e., those who see concepts as involving crucially representations including sensorimotor information) claim that the same empirical evidence is compatible with their views. Secondly, there is no shared understanding of what a modal or amodal format amounts to. Both camps recognize that the two formats play essential roles in higher cognition, leading to an increasing number of hybrid proposals. In this paper, I argue that the existence of those fundamental problems should make us suspicious about a modal/amodal dichotomy. Also, I suggest that hybrid approaches, as they currently stand, do not provide suitable solutions to the impasse. Instead, we should overcome the dichotomy and treat the modal/amodal distinction as a graded phenomenon. I illustrate this hypothesis with an example of a cognitive-computational model of concepts based on the Predictive Processing framework.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An analysis of conceptual ambiguities in the debate on the format of concepts.Renato Raia - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-26.
Perceptions of perceptual symbols.Lawrence Barsalou - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):637-660.
Amodal or perceptual symbol systems: A false dichotomy?W. Martin Davies - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):162-163.
Legal Concepts as Mental Representations.Marek Jakubiec - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (5):1837-1855.
Fractality is an Amodal Property.Oliver Lukitsch - 2021 - Constructivist Foundations 16 (3):308-310.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-03

Downloads
62 (#279,350)

6 months
12 (#235,503)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christian Michel
VU University Amsterdam