Judgments About Side Effects of Actions Are Distinct From Judgments About the Actions Themselves

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):21-22 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aggregating Causal Judgments.Richard Bradley, Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (4):491-515.
Walker on the voluntariness of judgment.Christian Stein - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):175 – 186.
Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments.John Turri, Wesley Buckwalter & David Rose - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):212-222.
Varieties of Social Cognition.Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3):293-322.
Autism, episodic memory, and moral exemplars.Nathan Stout - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (6):858-870.
The argument from motivation.Frank Snare - 1975 - Mind 84 (333):1-9.
Good and bad actions.Alastair Norcross - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
18 (#814,090)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Michael
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics”.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):W1-W4.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Neuroethics: A New Way of Doing Ethics.Neil Levy - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):3-9.

Add more references