Is memory a natural kind?

Memory Studies 4 (2):170-189 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Though researchers often refer to memory as if it were a unitary phenomenon, a natural kind, the apparent heterogeneity of the various "kinds" of memory casts doubt on this default view. This paper argues, first, that kinds of memory are individuated by memory systems. It argues, second, for a view of the nature of kinds of memory informed by the tri-level hypothesis. If this approach to kinds of memory is right, then memory is not in fact a natural kind

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-08

Downloads
1,044 (#21,098)

6 months
155 (#30,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What memory is.Stan Klein - 2015 - WIREs Cognitive Science 6 (1):1-38.
Beyond the causal theory? Fifty years after Martin and Deutscher.Kourken Michaelian & Sarah Robins - 2018 - In Kourken Michaelian, Dorothea Debus & Denis Perrin, New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge. pp. 13-32.
Naturalism and simulationism in the philosophy of memory.Nikola Andonovski & Kourken Michaelian - 2024 - In Ali Hossein Khani, Gary Kemp, Hassan Amiriara & Hossein Sheykh Rezaee, Naturalism and its challenges. New York, NY: Routledge.

View all 37 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Vision.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.

View all 19 references / Add more references