Anthropology of Homo Interpretans

Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 8 (2):9-21 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Paul Ricœur is rightly regarded as one of the greatest representants of the hermeneutical tradition, at the crossroads of epistemological filiation from Schleiermacher and Dilthey and the ontological filiation of Heidegger to Gadamer. Johann Michel's bias in this article is to explore a third way of hermeneutics under the guise of an interpretative anthropology. Before being a set of scholarly techniques applied to specific fields, hermeneutics derives originally from ordinary techniques of interpretation at work in the world of life. The purpose of the contribution is to show how Ricoeur's hermeneutics can give serious directions for elaborating such an interpretive anthropology, in which case it also needs to be supplemented by other intellectual traditions to achieve this goal.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Anthropology: a continental perspective.Christoph Wulf - 2013 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hermeneutics in Anthropology: A Review Essay.Michael Agar - 1980 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 8 (3):253-272.
Introduction: Philosophical Anthropology and Social Analysis.Anna Borisenkova - 2012 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 3 (1):1-5.
Pragmatism, realism and hermeneutics.Patrick Baert - 2003 - Foundations of Science 8 (1):89-106.
The limits of auto-anthropology.Marilyn Strathern - 1987 - In Anthony Jackson (ed.), Anthropology at home. pp. 59-67.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-17

Downloads
24 (#620,575)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references