Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):415-418 (2005)
AbstractTrust among current and future patients is essential for the success of biobank research. The submission of an informed consent is an act of trust by a patient or a research subject, but a strict application of the rule of informed consent may not be sensitive to the multiplicity of patient interests at stake, and could thus be detrimental to trust. According to a recently proposed law on “genetic integrity” in Sweden, third parties will be prohibited from requesting or seeking genetic information about an individual. Cumbersome restrictions on research may be lifted, thus creating a more favourable climate for medical research
Similar books and articles
Adequate trust avails, mistaken trust matters: On the moral responsibility of doctors as proxies for patients' trust in biobank research.Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Mats G. Hansson & Stefan Eriksson - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (9):485-492.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships.Sandro Castaldo, Katia Premazzi & Fabrizio Zerbini - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4):657 - 668.
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
Trust in Strangers, Trust in Friends.Jessica Miller - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):17-22.
The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online.Colin Rule & Larry Friedberg - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):193-205.
Public trust, commercialisation, and benefit sharing : towards a trustworthy biobank in Taiwan.Hung-En Liu & Terence Hua Tai - 2009 - In Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner (ed.), Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement. Routledge.
Trust, Testimony, and Prejudice in the Credibility Economy.Gerald Marsh - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (2):280-293.
Biobanks--When is Re-consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Trust me, I’m a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1):43-50.
Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than ethics guidelines and review.Linus Johnsson, Stefan Eriksson, Gert Helgesson & Mats G. Hansson - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (1):29-46.
Can we know if donor trust expires? About trust relationships and time in the context of open consent for future data use.Felix Gille & Caroline Brall - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (3):184-188.
Health data research on sudden cardiac arrest: perspectives of survivors and their next-of-kin.Dick L. Willems, Hanno L. Tan, Marieke T. Blom, Rens Veeken & Marieke A. R. Bak - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.
Accessing medical biobanks to solve crimes: ethical considerations.Nina F. de Groot, Britta C. van Beers, Lieven Decock & Gerben Meynen - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (7):502-509.
References found in this work
Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms.Graeme Laurie - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
Genetic privacy: a challenge to medico-legal norms: G Laurie. Cambridge University Press, 2002, 50.00 (hbk), pp 335. ISBN 0521660270. [REVIEW]D. Dickenson - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):373-374.