Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99 - 120 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I highlight two opposing models of the notion of divine revelation: the propositional and the radical. The propositional understanding of revelation was central to theology and philosophy until the 19th century. Since then, a number of other models of revelation have emerged. I define as radical the understanding of revelation which emphasizes two features of revelation: (1) God’s existence is per se revelatory; (2) God’s revelation is per se self-revelation. I propose too an assessment of the notion of propositional revelation as presented by Richard Swinburne. And I offer detailed analyses of two representatives of the early understanding of divine revelation as self-revelation: the views of Bernard Bolzano and Anton Günther. Bolzano, the renowned mathematician, was also a philosopher of religion; and Günther, one of the most ingenious writers in Austrian philosophy, was not only a theologian but also a philosopher comparable to the important figures of 19th-century Ge

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Revelation and Human Person.Balázs M. Mezei - 2006 - Philosophy and Theology 18 (2):337-354.
History as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):293-304.
Reply: A Further Defence of Christian Revelation.Richard Swinburne - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (3):395 - 400.
Prophetic Experience as Revelation.Bernard Cooke - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (3):214-224.
Swinburne’s View of the Islamic Revelation.Amir Dastmalchian - 2008 - Journal of Shi‘a Islamic Studies 1 (4):95-106.
Revelation in Our Knowledge of God.Richard Swinburne - 1992 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Revelation in Islam.Rodney Blackhirst - 1994 - Asian Philosophy 4 (1):71-79.
Kant and Swinburne on Revelation.Kelli S. O’Brien - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):535-557.
Revelation and the God of Israel.Norbert Max Samuelson - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reason and revelation: Kant and the problem of authority. [REVIEW]Phil Enns - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):103 - 114.
Revelation and Physicalism.Nic Damnjanovic - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (1):69-91.
The Trinity in Universal Revelation.Richard Viladesau - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):317-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-27

Downloads
773 (#19,126)

6 months
453 (#3,440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Phenomenology as Philosophy of Revelation.Balázs M. Mezei - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (3):139-166.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
?!.Michael Schmitz - manuscript

Add more references