Philosophy Compass 10 (9):592-600 (2015)
AbstractThis two-part paper reviews a scholarly debate on an alleged tension in Frege's philosophy of logic. In Section 1 of Part I, I discuss Frege's view that logic is concerned with establishing norms for correct thinking and is therefore a normative science. In Section 2, I explore a different understanding of the role of logic that Frege seems to advance: logic is constitutive of the very possibility of thought, because it sets forth necessary conditions for thought. Hence, the tension the view according to which logic is normative for thought seems to be incompatible with the idea that abiding by the laws of logic forms a precondition for thought. In Section 1 of Part II, I survey a number of interpretations of Frege's conception of logic that deal with this question. I show that they are for the most part either normative readings (emphasising the former understanding of the nature of logic) or constitutive readings (emphasising the latter). Finally, in Section 2, I adjudicate the debate and aim at reconciling the normative and the constitutive strands in Frege's conception of logic.
Similar books and articles
Frege on the Normativity and Constitutivity of Logic for Thought I.Daniele Mezzadri - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (9):583-591.
Frege on Truth, Assertoric Force and the Essence of Logic.Dirk Greimann - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (3):272-288.
Truth, assertion, and the horizontal: Frege on "the essence of logic".William W. Taschek - 2008 - Mind 117 (466):375-401.
Language and Logic in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.Daniele Mezzadri - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Stirling
The primacy of concepts and the priority of judgments in Frege's logic.Marco Ruffino - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 56 (1):73-90.
The scope of logic: deduction, abduction, analogy.Carlo Cellucci - 1998 - Theoria 64 (2-3):217-242.
Optics of Thought: Logic and Vision in Müller, Helmholtz, and Frege.D. C. McCarty - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):365-378.
The Further Question: Frege, Husserl and the Neo-Kantian Paradigm.David Sullivan - 2002 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 5.
Frege's conception of logic: From Kant to grundgesetze.Øystein Linnebo - 2003 - Manuscrito 26 (2):235-252.
Frege Explained: From Arithmetic to Analytic Philosophy.Joan Carol Weiner - 2004 - Chicago, IL, USA: Open Court.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
One Heresy and One Orthodoxy: On Dialetheism, Dimathematism, and the Non-normativity of Logic.Heinrich Wansing - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-25.
Logical pluralism, indeterminacy and the normativity of logic.Filippo Ferrari & Sebastiano Moruzzi - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63 (3-4):323-346.
Frege on Anti‐Psychologism and the Role of Logic in Thinking.Thomas Lockhart - 2016 - Theoria 82 (4):302-328.
References found in this work
Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. [REVIEW]A. Reix - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 172 (1):64-64.
Psychologism: A Case Study in the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge.Martin Kusch - 1995 - Routledge.