What does it mean to predict one's own utterances?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):367 - 368 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many authors have recently highlighted the importance of prediction for language comprehension. Pickering & Garrod (P&G) are the first to propose a central role for prediction in language production. This is an intriguing idea, but it is not clear what it means for speakers to predict their own utterances, and how prediction during production can be empirically distinguished from production proper

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Minimal propositions and real world utterances.Nellie Wieland - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (3):401 - 412.
Situated Utterances and Discourse Relations.Ernest Lepore, Una Stojnic & Matthew Stone - 2013 - In Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Computational Semantics. Potsdam: IWCS. pp. 390 – 396.
Common Knowledge.Peter Vanderschraaf - unknown - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Context shifting arguments.Ernie Lepore & Herman Cappelen - 2003 - Philosophical Perspectives 17 (1):25–50.
Deferred Utterances and Proper Contexts.Marco Ruffino - 2012 - Disputatio 4 (34):807-822.
Two distinctions concerning emulators.Mark Wexler - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):422-422.
Are explicit performatives assertions?Mark Jary - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (2):207 - 234.
Knowledge and certainty.Jason Stanley - 2008 - Philosophical Issues 18 (1):35-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
29 (#518,760)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references