Tense, propositions, and facts

Synthese 193 (11):3691-3699 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper aims to clarify the connection between the logic of temporal distinctions and the temporal features of propositions. Contra Prior, it argues that the adoption of tense operators does not commit one to the view that propositions can change their truth value over time.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):406-419.
‘Now’ and ‘Then’ in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (2):229-247.
Predicate Metric Tense Logic for 'Now' and 'Then'.M. J. Cresswell - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):1-24.
Times in Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):201--19.
Philosophical Issues in Tense Logic.Marthe Atwater Chandler - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Worlds and Times.Ulrich Meyer - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):25--37.
Outline for a Truth-Conditional Semantics for Tense.Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Tense, Time and Reference. MIT Press. pp. 49-105.
No future.Leon Horsten & Hannes Leitgeb - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):259-265.
A note on the interpolation property in tense logic.Frank Wolter - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):545-551.
Temporal Necessity; Hard Facts/Soft Facts.William Lane Craig - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (2/3):65 - 91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-19

Downloads
105 (#163,388)

6 months
14 (#168,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ulrich Meyer
Colgate University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations