Talents, abilities and educational justice

Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):799-809 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The assumption that students are differently talented often underlies the public and philosophical debate about the justice of school systems. It is striking that despite the centrality of the notion of ‘talent’ in these debates, the concept is hardly ever explicated. I will suggest two explications: First, philosophers who point to different talents often assume that these are somehow fixed potentials that pose limits to what someone can achieve. According to this understanding, no matter how hard someone tries, she simply cannot perform well due to a lack of talent. Second, talking about different talents can be understood as saying that two students who will receive the same amount of educational resources are nevertheless expected to perform differently in the future. In the public as well as the philosophical debate it is common to assume that educational prospects should be equalized when it comes to unequal social backgrounds, but not when it comes to unequal talents. In this paper, I put into question three reasons that could speak in favor of this assumption: the first refers to the connection between talents and limits, the second to the relation between talents and the transformation of resources and the last one to the idea that talents somehow go back to the person’s true self.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,022

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talents, abilities and educational justice.Kirsten Meyer - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):799-809.
Natural born talents undiscovered.Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
Talents and distributive justice: some tensions.Mitja Sardoč & Tomaž Deželan - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):768-776.
Talent dispositionalism.Catherine M. Robb - 2020 - Synthese 198 (9):8085-8102.
Talent scouts, not practice scouts: Talents are real.David C. Rowe - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):421-422.
The belief in innate talent and its implications for distributive justice.Mark C. Vopat - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):819-832.
The potential of education in organization management of the talents in modern social changes.Катерина Геннадіївна Михайльова - 2019 - Вісник Нюу Імені Ярослава Мудрого: Серія: Філософія, Філософія Права, Політологія, Соціологія 4 (43):61-73.
Self-Cultivation and Moral Choice.Julia Maskivker - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (2):131-158.
Rawls and the Colledive Ownership of Natural Abilities.Andrew Kernohan - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):19-28.
Pragmatic Aesthetics and the Autistic Artist. Hunter & Barnbaum - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (4):48-56.
Talents and distributive justice: An interview with Hillel Steiner.Mitja Sardoc - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1393-1398.


Added to PP

9 (#959,006)

6 months
3 (#241,957)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kirsten Meyer
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations