Sentential constants in R and r⌝

Studia Logica 45 (3):301 - 327 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we shall confine ourselves to the study of sentential constants in the system R of relevant implication.In dealing with the behaviour of the sentential constants in R, we shall think of R itself as presented in three stages, depending on the level of truth-functional involvement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of logical constants.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Sentential constants in systems near R.John Slaney - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):443 - 455.
Sequent-systems for modal logic.Kosta Došen - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (1):149-168.
Guarded fragments with constants.Balder ten Cate & Massimo Franceschet - 2005 - Journal of Logic 14 (3):281-288.
Guarded fragments with constants.Balder ten Cate & Massimo Franceschet - 2005 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (3):281-288.
Truth via Sentential Quantification.Mark Textor - 2005 - Dialogue 44 (3):539-550.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#298,901)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Foundations of mathematical logic.Haskell Brooks Curry - 1963 - New York: Dover Publications.
Begründung einer strengen Implikation.Wilhelm Ackermann - 1956 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):113-128.
Classical relevant logics II.Robert K. Meyer & Richard Routley - 1974 - Studia Logica 33 (2):183 - 194.
Intensional models for first degree formulas.Nuel D. Belnap - 1967 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1):1-22.
RI the Bounds of Finitude.Robert K. Meyer - 1970 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 16 (7):385-387.

View all 7 references / Add more references