Bioethics 29 (5):342-352 (2015)

Demands for access to experimental therapies are frequently framed in the language of rights. This article examines the justifiability of such demands in the specific context of surgical innovations, these being promising but non-validated and potentially risky departures from standard surgical practices. I argue that there is a right to access innovative surgery, drawing analogies with other generally accepted rights in medicine, such as the right not to be forcibly treated, to buy contraceptives, and to choose to have an abortion, including a post-viability abortion where the mother's life or health is threatened by the pregnancy. I argue that we accept these rights because we believe that people are entitled to try to preserve their lives and health and to make choices of an important and intensely personal kind, and I suggest that a person's choice of medical treatment should be seen in the same light. However, since few rights are absolute, I also consider the circumstances in which it may be justifiable to limit the right to access innovative surgery. In discussing this question, I apply the human rights standard of proportionality, comparing the importance of the reasons for limiting the right with the severity of the invasion on liberty
Keywords innovative surgery  rights
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12111
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Innovative Surgery and the Precautionary Principle.Denise Meyerson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht047.
Innovative Surgery: The Ethical Challenges.Jane Johnson & Wendy Rogers - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):9-12.
Addressing Within-Role Conflicts of Interest in Surgery.Wendy A. Rogers & Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):219-225.
Toward the "Rights of the Poor": Human Rights in Liberation Theology.Mark Engler - 2000 - Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (3):339 - 365.
The Case Against Coronary Artery Surgery.Jochen Schaefer - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (2):155-176.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #497,618 of 2,533,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes