Arithmetic Formulated Relevantly

Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (5):154-288 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to formulate first-order Peano arithmetic within the resources of relevant logic, and to demonstrate certain properties of the system thus formulated. Striking among these properties are the facts that it is trivial that relevant arithmetic is absolutely consistent, but classical first-order Peano arithmetic is straightforwardly contained in relevant arithmetic. Under, I shall show in particular that 0 = 1 is a non-theorem of relevant arithmetic; this, of course, is exactly the formula whose unprovability was sought in the Hilbert program for proving arithmetic consistent. Under, I shall exhibit the requisite translation, drawing some Goedelian conclusions therefrom. Left open, however, is the critical problem whether Ackermann’s rule γ is admissible for theories of relevant arithmetic. The particular system of relevant Peano arithmetic featured in this paper shall be called R♯. Its logical base shall be the system R of relevant implication, taken in its first-order form RQ. Among other Peano arithmetics we shall consider here in particular the systems C♯, J♯, and RM3♯; these are based respectively on the classical logic C, the intuitionistic logic J, and the Sobocinski-Dunn semi-relevant logic RM3. And another feature of the paper will be the presentation of a system of natural deduction for R♯, along lines valid for first-order relevant theories in general. This formulation of R♯ makes it possible to construct relevantly valid arithmetical deductions in an easy and natural way; it is based on, but is in some respects more convenient than, the natural deduction formulations for relevant logics developed by Anderson and Belnap in Entailment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fallacies of Division.Robert K. Meyer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:71-80.
Quantum Mathematics.J. Michael Dunn - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:512 - 531.
Arithmetic Formulated in a Logic of Meaning Containment.Ross Brady - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Logic 18 (5):447-472.
Relevant Robinson's arithmetic.J. Michael Dunn - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (4):407 - 418.
Inconsistent models for relevant arithmetics.Robert Meyer & Chris Mortensen - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):917-929.
⊃E is Admissible in “true” relevant arithmetic.Robert K. Meyer - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (4):327-351.
⊃E is Admissible in “true” relevant arithmetic.Robert K. Meyer - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (4):327 - 351.
Arithmetic with Fusions.Jeff Ketland & Thomas Schindler - 2016 - Logique Et Analyse 234:207-226.
Self-reference and the languages of arithmetic.Richard Heck - 2007 - Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-01

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A general logic.John Slaney - 1990 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):74 – 88.
Consistent Theories in Inconsistent Logics.Franci Mangraviti & Andrew Tedder - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (04):1133-1148.
Multisets and relevant implication I.Robert K. Meyer & Michael A. McRobbie - 1982 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (2):107 – 139.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references