Drawing the line on metacognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):350-351 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Only two of the many experiments described by Smith et al., as indicating metacognitive ability in nonhuman animals, involved metacognition as understood in the human literature. Of these, one gave negative results. In the other, one of two rhesus monkeys provided data suggesting that he might have metacognitive ability. The conjecture that any nonhuman animals have metacognitive ability is, therefore, tenuous.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence both for and against metacognition is insufficient.Thomas R. Zentall - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):357-358.
Metacognition and consciousness.Asher Koriat - 2007 - In P D Zelazo, M Moscovitch & E Thompson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Monitoring without metacognition.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):342-343.
Consciousness, content, and metacognitive judgments.David M. Rosenthal - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):203-214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#458,553)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can Rats Reason?Savanah Stephane - 2015 - Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 (4):404-429.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references