An Analysis of the Leading Conceptual Confusions in George Berkeley's 'Anessay Towards a New Theory of Vision.'

Dissertation, The University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analysis in Berkeley's Theory of Vision.Daniel E. Flage - 2011 - In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's lasting legacy: 300 years later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Berkeley's revolution in vision.Margaret Atherton - 1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision Berkeley in the Modern Context.David Vernon - 1992 - Trinity College, Department of Computer Science.
Minima sensibilia in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.Krzysztof Stachowiak - 2008 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 53.
Berkeley's New Theory of Vision: Science of Metaphysics?Luc Peterschmitt - 2011 - In Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.), Berkeley's lasting legacy: 300 years later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Abstract ideas and the new theory of vision.George S. Pappas - 2002 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated.Thomas M. Lennon - 2007 - History of European Ideas 33 (3):321-329.
Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley.Paolo F. Mugnai - 1979 - Roma: Edizioni dell'Ateneo & Bizzarri.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references